Is not inconclusive. Is not in conclusions, but in concluding to make conclusions that justifies how it is not inconclusive. Just not of a conclusive nature. Is not something that ends, that travels with time till a point and then separates. Is just and fair, what we know as existence.

Non-conclusive means that it includes all aspects of its own, but remains inspite of it undecipherable. It is just a subject of undecipherable character. Character is just a word used to help in determining the fairness of what’s undecipherable. It isn’t undecipherable and abstract and unknown. It is very much here and now, alive and simple, clear and even agile. But remains to be deciphered because is of a non-dual, non concluding, conceptually undetermined character. It is determining its own conclusion in an uncompromising, unconcluding, conscious way, almost compulsively, because there is something undying, unending, unthinkable in its character. Character is just a word used to help, but a just word regardless.

The character is not in concluding but in consciously not concluding, to be conscious more intensely from there and not settle for another something silly. The character is not characterized but is characterizing to become the act of no actor, which is only acting. These are matters of semantics now, which is just how language becomes to come of use here, and character comes of use there. There, which is non-conclusive, and a complete concluded inclusion.

What has completely concluded is the setting of conclusions. Conclusions about self, life, goals, missions, states, words. It’s a very just and fair existence, if one doesn’t think up how else it is to be!

Yuvraj Goswami is the author of No Point Talking. available on amazon. Excerpts are on www.elefemel.com and @nopointtalking on Instagram.